Game of the Year arguments rarely end neatly. In this video feature, Brian David Gilbert takes a statistical approach to the question and attempts to calculate which release deserves the 2018 crown.
A formula for Game of the Year
Rather than relying only on personal preference, the feature explores whether a carefully constructed formula can turn competing opinions into a measurable result. The aim is simple: use statistics to identify the best game of 2018.
The concept offers an entertaining counterpoint to the usual awards-season debates, where different genres, platforms and play styles make direct comparisons difficult. It also highlights how the definition of “best” can change depending on the criteria being measured.
Why the method matters
A numerical system cannot remove every disagreement, but it can make the reasoning behind a choice more visible. That makes this an appealing subject for anyone interested in game rankings, awards and the ways players assess interactive entertainment.
For more features covering the wider arcade and gaming scene, explore the RETROCADE blog. If you are comparing dedicated hardware for home play, the arcade machine buying guide is a useful place to start.
From debate to calculation
The result is less about ending every argument than examining what happens when a subjective award is treated as a data problem. Gilbert’s approach gives the 2018 Game of the Year discussion a deliberately scientific twist while keeping the focus on games.
Players looking to bring classic competition into a games room can browse arcade machines, or consider compact bartop arcades where space is limited.
Leave a Reply